Articles

DART-MS for Rapid Screening in Analytical Workflows

DART-MS enables rapid, low-prep mass spectrometry screening for food, environmental, forensic, pharmaceutical, and materials testing workflows.
Written byAimee Cichocki
White powder sample for DART-MS analysis

iStock

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
4:00

Direct analysis in real time mass spectrometry, or DART-MS, gives laboratories a fast route to chemical screening with little or no sample preparation. For analytical scientists working across food safety, environmental testing, forensic chemistry, pharmaceutical analysis, and materials characterization, that speed can change how samples move through the lab.

DART-MS belongs to the broader family of ambient ionization mass spectrometry techniques. Instead of requiring every sample to move through a chromatographic separation before detection, DART-MS ionizes compounds near the mass spectrometer inlet under atmospheric conditions. This allows direct analysis of solids, liquids, powders, surfaces, extracts, and other sample types, depending on the workflow and sample presentation method. NIST describes DART as a rapid, noncontact ambient ionization source that can analyze solid, liquid, or gas samples without extensive sample preparation.

That makes DART-MS attractive for screening. It can help analysts answer an early question: does this sample contain a compound, pattern, or signal that deserves deeper investigation?

Working in analytical science?

Register for a FREE Separation Science account to subscribe to the Separation Science Newsletter.

Subscribe for free

Where DART-MS Fits

DART-MS should not be viewed as a blanket replacement for LC-MS or GC-MS. Chromatography remains essential when separation, robust quantitation, isomer resolution, or regulatory confirmation drives the method. DART-MS adds value earlier in the workflow, where speed, simplicity, and sample throughput matter.

In many labs, DART-MS works best as a triage tool. It can help identify suspect samples, reduce the number of samples that require full chromatographic analysis, or support rapid decisions during troubleshooting and screening. For high-volume environments, this can shift confirmatory resources toward the samples that need them most.

DART-MS has gained attention across several application areas. A 2024 review described DART-MS as an effective technique for rapid and accurate food sample analysis, with discussion of ionization mechanisms, devices, and parameter settings. A 2025 review notes use across food analysis, forensic science, pharmaceutical analysis, clinical science, environmental science, and other fields, driven by minimal sample preparation and direct sample analysis.

The key question is practical: where does DART-MS improve a workflow, and where does it introduce analytical trade-offs?

Why Labs Consider DART-MS

The appeal starts with speed. Conventional workflows often require extraction, cleanup, derivatization, injection, separation, and data review. DART-MS can reduce that front-end burden for suitable samples. It also supports direct analysis of sample forms that may prove awkward for conventional injection-based workflows.

DART-MS can benefit workflows that need fast screening across diverse sample types. Common use cases include checking food authenticity, screening seized materials, investigating pharmaceutical tablets or raw materials, evaluating surface residues, and exploring environmental contaminants. The technique can also support method development by giving analysts a rapid first look at chemical signatures before they commit to a longer chromatographic method.

Several strengths drive that interest:

  • Little sample preparation: Analysts can often screen samples with fewer extraction and cleanup steps.
  • Rapid analysis: Short analysis times support sample triage and high-throughput screening.
  • Flexible sample presentation: DART-MS can accommodate solids, liquids, powders, tablets, surfaces, and swabs, depending on method design.
  • Real-time feedback: Analysts can assess signals quickly and adjust screening decisions.
  • Compatibility with high-resolution MS: Accurate mass data can improve confidence in screening and unknown analysis.

These strengths make DART-MS useful for early decisions. They do not remove the need for method control, validation, or confirmatory analysis.

Application Areas with Strong Potential

Food analysis represents one of the clearest opportunities. DART-MS can support rapid screening for adulteration, authenticity, residues, and contaminants. In food testing, the technique may help labs flag suspect products before applying more targeted LC-MS or GC-MS methods.

Continue reading below…
WebinarsPFAS hexagonal network infographic template with chemical safety icons.
Advancing PFAS Analysis: From Hidden Precursors to Food Safety Workflows
Discover practical approaches for detecting, analyzing, and addressing PFAS contamination in environmental and food-related samples.
Read More

Environmental testing offers another opportunity, especially where labs need faster ways to screen complex sample sets. Interest in PFAS analysis has also reached DART-MS. One 2025 paper frames DART-MS as a rapid approach with little to no sample preparation for PFAS analysis, while contrasting it with more solvent- and time-intensive LC-MS workflows.

Forensic chemistry has become one of the most visible DART-MS application areas. NIST highlights the ability to gather real-time results with little to no sample preparation as a reason ambient ionization MS techniques such as DART-MS appeal to seized-drug screening workflows.

Pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical labs may also find value in rapid screening. Potential applications include counterfeit medicine screening, raw material checks, excipient evaluation, degradation investigations, and surface residue analysis. In regulated environments, however, DART-MS needs a clear role. It may support investigation and screening, while validated LC-MS or GC-MS methods remain central for release testing and formal quantitation.

What DART-MS Does Not Solve

DART-MS reduces preparation and separation time, but it does not remove analytical complexity. Matrix effects, ion suppression, thermal behavior, source conditions, sample positioning, and data interpretation can all influence results. Analysts still need to understand how the sample enters the ionization region and how that affects signal quality.

The lack of chromatographic separation can create challenges. Co-occurring compounds may share mass spectral features or interfere with interpretation. Isomers may require additional separation or tandem MS strategies. Quantitation may prove more difficult than with established LC-MS or GC-MS workflows, especially in complex matrices.

That means DART-MS often works best when the method’s purpose stays clear. A screening method does not need to answer every confirmatory question. It needs to identify which samples, compounds, or patterns warrant further analysis.

How to Assess a DART-MS Workflow

Labs considering DART-MS should start with the decision the method needs to support. A screening workflow for food authenticity will have different requirements than a forensic seized-drug workflow or a pharmaceutical raw material check.

Continue reading below…
SymposiaLaboratory technician conducting forensic toxicology testing
Symposium: Modern Techniques in Forensic Toxicology and Drug Testing
Explore how modern techniques are enhancing forensic toxicology and drug testing at our upcoming symposium.
Read More

Before adopting the technique, analysts should assess:

  • Sample type: Can the sample be presented to the source in a reproducible way?
  • Matrix complexity: Will co-extracted or co-present compounds interfere with interpretation?
  • Required confidence: Is the method intended for triage, identification, semi-quantitation, or confirmation?
  • Throughput needs: Will rapid screening relieve a real workflow bottleneck?
  • Data handling: Are spectral libraries, accurate mass tools, or chemometric approaches needed?
  • Follow-up methods: Which LC-MS, GC-MS, or orthogonal techniques will confirm important findings?

This assessment helps prevent a common mistake: judging DART-MS by the wrong standard. The technique does not need to replace every chromatographic method to deliver value. It needs to improve the right part of the analytical workflow.

The Role of DART-MS in Modern Analytical Labs

Analytical laboratories face pressure to process more samples, reduce preparation time, and generate actionable results faster. DART-MS responds to that pressure by moving mass spectrometry closer to direct sample screening.

Its strongest value lies in speed and flexibility. It can help labs decide where to focus deeper analytical resources, especially when sample numbers rise or when rapid answers matter. Its limits also matter. Without chromatography, analysts must manage selectivity, matrix effects, and data interpretation with care.

For many laboratories, the future role of DART-MS will not center on replacing LC-MS or GC-MS. It will center on smarter workflow design. Used well, DART-MS can sit at the front end of analytical testing, helping scientists screen faster, prioritize samples, and reserve confirmatory methods for the cases that demand them.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

  • What is DART-MS?

    DART-MS, or Direct Analysis in Real Time Mass Spectrometry, is a technique that allows for the rapid screening of chemical samples with minimal or no sample preparation, ideal for various fields such as food safety, environmental testing, and forensic chemistry.

  • How does DART-MS differ from traditional mass spectrometry methods?

    Unlike traditional methods like LC-MS or GC-MS, DART-MS does not require chromatographic separation before detection. It ionizes samples directly under atmospheric conditions, facilitating faster analysis.

  • What are common applications for DART-MS?

    DART-MS is commonly used for food authenticity testing, screening seized materials in forensic analysis, evaluating pharmaceutical products, and assessing environmental contaminants, among others.

  • What are the advantages of using DART-MS?

    Key advantages of DART-MS include minimal sample preparation, rapid analysis times, flexible sample presentation, real-time feedback, and compatibility with high-resolution mass spectrometry for improved analysis accuracy.

  • What limitations does DART-MS have?

    While DART-MS offers speed and efficiency, it does not eliminate analytical challenges such as matrix effects, ion suppression, or the need for confirmatory analyses, particularly in complex sample scenarios.

Add Separation Science as a preferred source on Google

Add Separation Science as a preferred Google source to see more of our trusted coverage

Meet the Author(s):

  • Aimee Cichocki is the Editorial Director at Separation Science and Chromatography Forum. Aimee brings a broad range of experience in creating, editing, and formatting scientific content. With a degree in medicinal chemistry, a 10-year background in formulation chemistry, an MBA, and a diverse background in publishing, Aimee guides editorial initiatives at Separation Science and Chromatography Forum. Aimee is dedicated to ensuring the delivery of informative, reliable, and practical content to our audience of analytical scientists.

    View Full Profile

Here are some related topics that may interest you:

Loading Next Article...
Loading Next Article...