Articles

Expanding PFAS Detection: LC-MS/MS Breakthrough Targets Ultra-Short Chains

As regulations tighten around the world, a new method promises more complete PFAS analysis in a single run, covering even the elusive ultra-short chains.
Written byAimee Cichocki, Craig Butt, and Cora J. Young
Lush green tea fields, context for PFAS contamination studies

iStock

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
3:00

Laboratories worldwide face mounting pressure to detect per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) across a broad range of sample types—from water and soil to food and pharmaceuticals. Detecting and quantifying these persistent pollutants typically requires multiple complex methods. Now, scientists at SCIEX and York University are collaborating to change that.

Their LC-MS/MS approach enables detection of ultra-short, short-, and long-chain PFAS compounds in a single injection. It offers a potential breakthrough for labs working to comply with emerging safety regulations from the U.S., EU, Canada, and beyond.

Analytical Barriers to the “Shorties”

Historically, ultra-short PFAS such as trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) were either ignored or underestimated. According to Craig Butt, Senior Manager, Scientific Marketing at SCIEX, the analytical difficulty led many researchers to dismiss these compounds altogether. “It was very polar, it didn’t accumulate, and it was hard to measure. So people stopped looking,” he advises.

Cora Young, Professor and the Roger Chair in Chemistry at York University, encountered these challenges firsthand. Her earlier research into short-chain PFAS used ion chromatography-mass spectrometry (IC-MS), not LC-MS/MS. LC-MS methods at the time couldn’t effectively handle matrix effects—even in clean samples such as ice cores. “We had to do extractions even when the concentrations were high enough to direct inject,” she recalls.

LC columns struggled to retain highly polar compounds, and contamination with TFA made quantification especially difficult. As a result, even when concentrations were significant, analysts couldn’t avoid sample prep—defeating the promise of simplicity in direct injection.

Chromatography Catches Up

SCIEX and York University tackled this issue from the chromatographic side. Improvements in reverse-phase LC allowed better separation of matrix interferences and more consistent retention, even for challenging analytes such as TFA.

“The novelty isn’t on the mass spec side,” notes Butt. “PFAS ionize extremely well because of their physical chemical properties. The challenge has always been on the chromatography side—getting good retention, managing matrix effects, and ensuring reproducibility.”

Background contamination also remains a persistent issue. “Analysts know PFAS is everywhere,” he explains. “But with TFA, it’s another order of magnitude.” Even delay columns—commonly used to separate system-related contamination—had to be redesigned. The extreme polarity of ultra-short PFAS meant existing solutions caused signal overlap and distorted peaks.

Environmental Signals and Exposure Trends

Young’s work has helped shine a spotlight on the widespread presence of ultra-short PFAS. Her ice core analyses, for instance, show clear temporal trends that link TFA spikes to the use of CFC replacements—chemicals introduced under the Montreal Protocol.

“Levels were substantially higher than any other PFAS we measured in ice cores,” she said. This was expected from an atmospheric perspective, but came as a surprise to many in the PFAS field.

TFA’s prevalence in rain, crops, and beverages has also raised new concerns. “Anything derived from plants—tea, wine, beer—you expect to find TFA, and we do,” warns Young. She adds that she'd be more surprised to find a sample without PFAS contamination than with it.

Exposure is no longer limited to industrial zones. PFAS now reach surface waters, agricultural soil, and food chains via atmospheric deposition and wastewater. “We’re starting to go upstream to look for contamination,” adds Butt, referencing growing interest in wastewater analysis and biosolid tracking.

Regulatory Lag and the Case for Method Consolidation

While Canada and the EU are moving toward class-based regulation that includes TFA, the U.S. EPA has yet to classify it within PFAS rules. Germany has begun looking at specific regulations for TFA, but most global guidance still focuses on legacy compounds.

This regulatory gap, combined with the analytical complexity, makes unified testing methods all the more critical. SCIEX’s approach offers one path forward by enabling labs to monitor both long-chain and ultra-short compounds with a single method. “With the method we’ve created, you can get everything in one injection rather than increasing your workload,” emphasizes Butt.

Most labs already rely on LC-MS/MS for PFAS testing, making the transition practical. “It’s accessible, and people have the expertise to use it,” asserts Young. IC-MS, by contrast, requires different skill sets and less common instrumentation.

The Road Ahead

As detection becomes easier and regulations expand, more labs will likely turn to LC-MS/MS to capture the full PFAS picture. Whether it’s in rainwater, wastewater, pharmaceuticals, or food and beverages, these persistent chemicals continue to surface—forcing scientists, regulators, and industries to keep up.

“It’s not good enough just to know your wine is contaminated,” Butt said. “You need to know why.”

Meet the Author(s):

  • Aimee Cichocki is the Associate Editorial Director at Separation Science and Chromatography Forum. Aimee brings a broad range of experience in creating, editing, and formatting scientific content. With a degree in medicinal chemistry, a 10-year background in formulation chemistry, an MBA, and a diverse background in publishing, Aimee guides editorial initiatives at Separation Science and Chromatography Forum. Aimee is dedicated to ensuring the delivery of informative, reliable, and practical content to our audience of analytical scientists.

    View Full Profile
  • Craig Butt

    Craig obtained his PhD in environmental chemistry at the University of Toronto, under the co-supervision of Dr. Scott Mabury and Dr. Derek Muir (Environment Canada), where he investigated the fate of PFAS in biological systems. Craig was then an NSERC postdoctoral research fellow and research scientist at Duke University, under the guidance of Dr. Heather Stapleton. Among other interesting topics, Craig's postdoctoral research involved measuring human PFAS exposure in serum, hand wipes, and wristbands. In his 20 years of mass spectrometry experience, Craig has published 48 peer-reviewed manuscripts, many of which are on PFAS, are globally recognized, and are highly cited. Within SCIEX, Craig is the applications lead for all things PFAS and has contributed to a variety of PFAS-specific applications, including EPA Methods 537.1 and 533.

    View Full Profile
  • Cora Young

    Cora J. Young is an associate professor and the Guy Warwick Rogers Chair in Chemistry at York University in Toronto, Canada. She has been studying PFAS for over twenty years, focusing on their atmospheric measurement and fate. She can be reached at youngcj@yorku.ca or through www.cjygroup.com.

    View Full Profile

Here are some related topics that may interest you:

Loading Next Article...
Loading Next Article...