Articles

Unlocking the Value of Legacy Mass Spectrometry Data

FAIR principles in labs can revolutionize mass spectrometry data usage, streamlining analyses and enhancing research productivity.
Written byAimee Cichocki
InterviewingAnsgar Korf
Scientist analyzes mass spectrometry data on a computer

iStock

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
4:00

For many analytical laboratories, the archive is both a treasure chest and a graveyard. Years of LC–MS and GC–MS data sit untouched, locked behind outdated software, incompatible formats, and forgotten acquisition parameters. “In theory, you have a gold mine from an old study,” Ansgar Korf, CEO and Co‑Founder of mzio GmbH, remarks, “but if the tech stack doesn’t work anymore, then the value is gone.”

Korf and his team at mzio are working to change that. Building on the long‑established mzmine platform, they are developing tools and frameworks that make mass spectrometry data FAIR—findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable—at enterprise scale. Their new initiative, FAIR-MS, aims to help labs finally unlock the scientific value buried in their historical datasets.

Why Labs Struggle to Reuse Old MS Data

Korf is direct about the core challenge: mass spectrometry data is inherently complex, and the tools to interpret it have not kept pace with the volume being generated.

“Looking at mass spec data is quite a task,” he notes. “If you do it manually, you get stuck pretty quickly.” Even when software exists, labs often face a second barrier: simply accessing the data. Pulling a five‑year‑old dataset from an archive can feel like digital archaeology. “You still don’t know how that data was acquired or whether you even have software that can read it.”

Working in analytical science?

Register for a FREE Separation Science account to subscribe to the Separation Science Newsletter.

Subscribe for free

Vendor lock‑in and shifting file formats only deepen the problem. While open formats such as mzML help, they still require conversion steps that slow down workflows. mzio’s approach is to read native vendor files directly, eliminating the conversion bottleneck and making historical data immediately usable.

What FAIR Means in Daily Lab Practice

FAIR principles are widely discussed in academic circles, but Korf emphasizes their practical value for working scientists. “FAIR principles make data useful,” he asserts. “If you cannot access the data by any blocker, then it’s worthless.” In daily practice, FAIR means that a lab should be able to retrieve, read, and analyze any dataset, regardless of age, instrument vendor, or software version.

Without that, labs waste time and money reacquiring data they already possess. Korf warns that this is really a waste, especially when older datasets may contain insights that were not detectable with earlier algorithms.

The Challenge of Vendor‑Neutral Workflows

Mixed‑vendor labs are now the norm, not the exception. But building workflows that operate seamlessly across different instrument ecosystems remains technically demanding.

According to Korf, the hardest barriers fall into two categories:

  • Different data types require different algorithms: “Ion mobility data needs to be treated differently than GC‑EI data,” he explains. A single workflow must accommodate multiple separation dimensions and acquisition modes.
  • Raw data accessibility: Even with open formats, conversion steps slow down analysis. “Having a tool that can read the native data files reduces another processing step,” he notes. “It speeds things up again.”

This is where mzio sees a major opportunity: providing a unified software layer that abstracts away vendor differences and lets scientists focus on the chemistry, not the file formats.

Calibration, Standardization, and Confidence in Multi‑Dimensional MS

As mass spectrometry becomes increasingly multidimensional (combining retention time, m/z, ion mobility, CCS, imaging, and fragmentation), the need for accurate calibration grows.

Korf highlights mzio’s collaboration with the Center for Mass Spectrometry and Optical Spectroscopy (CeMOS) in Mannheim, Germany, and Polymer Factory in Stockholm, Sweden, where they are developing integrated calibration mixtures for lipidomics. He notes that oxidized lipids, in particular, present a challenge because everything looks very similar in terms of fragmentation and MS¹ data.

The goal is to unify calibration across mass accuracy, retention time, and ion mobility using a single, software‑integrated standard. “The more accurate you are,” Korf emphasizes, “the higher the chance you’ll actually find something useful.”

Continue reading below…
Infographics3D visualization of protein structures in top-down proteomics
Top-Down vs Bottom-Up Proteomics
Explore the essentials of Top-Down Proteomics in battery materials quality control. Download our insightful infographic today!
Read More

What AI‑Ready Mass Spectrometry Data Really Requires

AI is the topic everyone wants to discuss—but Korf is careful to separate hype from practical reality.

In close collaboration with academic partners, mzio has gained expertise in training and using deep learning models based on data from public MS repositories, but the quality of public data is inconsistent. FAIR-MS aims to solve this by enabling companies to extract the most from their own internal data to create a high quality foundation for proprietary AI models.

This matters because AI models trained on metabolomics or natural products may not generalize to pharmaceutical or chemical industry datasets. “We want a model created inside one enterprise with their data,” Korf explains, “where we can control the quality and train models based on their actual needs.”

AI also plays a role in usability. mzio uses vector databases and embedding‑based search to make workflows faster and more intuitive. “This would simply not work without AI,” he adds.

Shifting the Focus of the Field

Mass spectrometry has long been driven by hardware innovation—higher sensitivity, faster acquisition, and more dimensions. Korf believes it’s time for software to shine.

“Traditionally the hardware is always in the spotlight,” he observes. “But now the amount of data is becoming more vast. It’s time to really extract the most out of it.”

The future, he argues, lies in tight integration between instruments and intelligent software that can interpret the data deluge.

Conclusion

Korf’s message is clear: the mass spectrometry community has invested heavily in generating data, but far less in making that data usable. FAIR principles, vendor‑neutral workflows, and AI‑ready data structures are no longer academic ideals—they are practical necessities.

As instruments continue to evolve, the real breakthroughs may come not from the hardware, but from the software that finally unlocks the full value of the data we already have.

Add Separation Science as a preferred source on Google

Add Separation Science as a preferred Google source to see more of our trusted coverage

Meet the Author(s):

  • Aimee Cichocki is the Editorial Director at Separation Science and Chromatography Forum. Aimee brings a broad range of experience in creating, editing, and formatting scientific content. With a degree in medicinal chemistry, a 10-year background in formulation chemistry, an MBA, and a diverse background in publishing, Aimee guides editorial initiatives at Separation Science and Chromatography Forum. Aimee is dedicated to ensuring the delivery of informative, reliable, and practical content to our audience of analytical scientists.

    View Full Profile

Interviewing

  • Ansgar Korf

    Dr. Ansgar Korf is a scientist and technology leader specializing in analytical chemistry, mass spectrometry, and scientific software development. He currently serves as Chief Executive Officer of mzio GmbH in Bremen, where he focuses on the development of software solutions for chemical analysis. Before taking on this role, he held several senior positions at Bruker Daltonics, including Senior Manager of Software Research & Development, Global Product Manager for the timsTOF MS platform, and Software Engineer, combining scientific expertise with product strategy and cross-functional leadership. His academic background includes a PhD in Analytical Chemistry, awarded summa cum laude by the University of Münster, with research focused on mass spectrometry data mining and computational methods for compound identification. He also holds a Master’s degree in Business Chemistry and a Bachelor’s degree in Food Chemistry. Earlier research stays at the University of Bristol and the University of Groningen further strengthened his interdisciplinary profile. Alongside his industry career, he has built a strong scientific record with 28 publications, more than 4,100 citations, and an h-index of 19.

    View Full Profile

Here are some related topics that may interest you:

Loading Next Article...
Loading Next Article...